With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
In last month’s markup of the BUILD Act, the House Foreign Affairs Committee advanced a number of smart changes. Yesterday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee followed suit, giving the legislation a greenlight and making some of its own improvements.
More time to plan a smooth transition. As anxious as we are to see the US government move quickly, the original 60 days is probably not enough for a detailed reorganization plan. The new deadline is 120 days.
More transparency (of project-level data). OPIC began publishing project-level information only in 2009, while much of the data was scattered across different pages or locked up in PDFs. In order to sort, filter, or analyze OPIC’s data, CGD had to spend months creating a public database. The original bill required the USIDFC to “maintain a user-friendly, publicly available, machine-readable database with detailed country-level information,” but the newly-amended legislation takes it a step further, requiring “project-level” detail.
Establishing a development advisory council. Like OPIC, the new USIDFC will have to balance competing objectives: managing financial risks, supporting US foreign policy goals, and achieving development outcomes. We’ve written before about how OPIC can do a better and more transparent job delivering on its development mission. We’ve also proposed a simple traffic light reporting system to track trade-offs. Another positive step is in the Senate amendment to create a nine-member development advisory council of outside experts to offer advice and guidance to the USIDFC Board.
Adding an independent accountability mechanism. Part of the rationale for the new agency is to provide an alternative to China’s financing model. Since 2005, OPIC has had an Office of Accountability, which plays an important role in addressing concerns or conflicts that might occur during projects. The bill advanced by the Senate panel includes language to ensure a similar accountability mechanism is present for the new institution.
CGD blog posts reflect the views of the authors, drawing on prior research and experience in their areas of expertise. CGD is a nonpartisan, independent organization and does not take institutional positions.
The four main recommendations of the Redesign Consensus: A Plan for US Assistance are to empower USAID as the lead independent aid agency, to create a full-fledged development finance institution, to establish a global development and humanitarian strategy, and to upgrade systems to better manage personnel, procurement, information, and evidence. This proposal concretely advances the dialogue between Congress, the administration, and civil society on reforming the US development architecture. It captures the main conclusions of a series of robust discussions among a diverse group of leaders, experts, and practitioners—and it represents a bold and comprehensive vision for a more coherent and modern development architecture.
In Congress, support for aid is often bipartisan, and the seriousness and quality of thinking about aid reform is often very high. Case in point on both fronts is new legislation introduced by US Senators Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.) that would create the architecture and principles for a policy review and assessment of US contributions to multilateral institutions.