With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s appearances before important Congressional Committees this week give us some clues about where the battle lines will be drawn between the Trump Administration’s budget proposals, including an almost 30 percent reduction to the State Department, and the negotiating positions of US lawmakers keen to defend America’s role on the global stage.
Here, CGD experts Amanda Glassman, Scott Morris, and Jeremy Konyndyk weigh in on some of the key points we heard (and live tweeted) during Secretary Tillerson’s testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and, later, when he answered questions from the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs.
Director of the US Development Policy Initiative, Co-Director of Sustainable Development Finance, and Senior Fellow
Did we miss anything? Please have your say in the comments section below. And thanks to Gailyn Portelance and Jared Kalow, star research assistants with CGD’s US Development Policy Initiative, for being on Twitter duty.
CGD blog posts reflect the views of the authors, drawing on prior research and experience in their areas of expertise. CGD is a nonpartisan, independent organization and does not take institutional positions.
The Trump administration delivered its FY 2019 budget request to Capitol Hill this week. Containing deep cuts to the international affairs budget, it looks a lot like a repeat of the FY 2018 request. And with a 30 percent reduction in topline spending, few programs were spared. Meanwhile, buried among the rubble are smart reform ideas that run the risk of being overshadowed—or even undermined—by the depth of the proposed spending reductions.