Ideas to Action:

Independent research for global prosperity

X

Views from the Center

Feed

The lead editorial in today’s Washington Post, Reforming Foreign Assistance, argues in support of proposals to move USAID into the State Department. It predicts that such a move will be opposed by special interest lobbying from U.S. aid contractors:

“Already there have been complaints that the administration is trying to "politicize" U.S. assistance by asserting State Department control -- an odd objection considering how political aid is already. These suspicions of politicization are likely to be compounded by obstruction from U.S.-based aid contractors, who will resent a threat to their earmarks. This resistance must be understood for what it is: special-interest lobbying that hardly serves the interests of poor countries.”

The editorial makes some decent points but does not address an important issue for the development community: To what degree will inserting USAID into the State Department –or reorganizing foreign aid boxes generally to bring greater strategic coherence – detract from the poverty alleviation objectives of development policy, versus other broader foreign policy/national security concerns (for example, rewarding allies)? This is an issue worthy of genuine debate. It is not, as the editorial suggests, just a question of contractor and special interest lobbying.

Related Topics:

Disclaimer

CGD blog posts reflect the views of the authors, drawing on prior research and experience in their areas of expertise. CGD is a nonpartisan, independent organization and does not take institutional positions.