Net Aid Transfers data set (1960-2006)

Publication Info

Publication Type

• Data Sets

Research Topics

• Aid Effectiveness
• Data Sets and Resources

CGD Expert

• David Roodman

Articles

• A year after Gleneagles pledges, Britain slips down [Guardian - London]
• Australia slips down 'aid rankings' [The Sydney Morning Herald]
• British policy let down by arms sales [The Independent - UK]
• Canada earns low grade for belching pollution [CanWest News Service - Canada]
• Dutch, Danes and Swedes do most for world's poor [EUobserver.com]
• Foreign aid tops world ranking [Denmark]
• Japan does least for lesser countries: U.S. journal [Japan Times]
• Japan ranks worst in contribution to developing world [Mainichi Daily News-Japan]
• Netherlands 'does most for poor' [BBC News - UK]
• New from the Commitment to Development Index
• Poverty: what counts [Financial Times]
• Ranking the Rich: NZ fifth in helping poor countries [New Zealand's National Business Review]
• Rich nations slow in helping poor: index [Taipei Times]
• Rich nations under fire on pledges to fight poverty [Financial Times - London]
• Swiss development aid fails to make big impact [Swissinfo - Switzerland]
• When Money Doesn't Help

Rights and Permissions

We welcome the use of CGD work-just let us know in advance! For contact information see our Rights & Permissions page. CGD rights and permissions are managed under the terms of the Creative Commons license below.

David Roodman

01/25/2008

In the CGD working paper An Index of Donor Performance (2005) David Roodman develops a new measure of foreign aid flow for use in the aid component of the Commitment to Development Index.

The Net Aid Transfers (NAT) variable corrects two aspects of the standard Net Overseas Development Assistance (Net ODA) measure that can be problematic for aid research and donor evaluation. First, where Net ODA is a capital flow concept, analogous to Net Foreign Direct Investment, NAT is a net transfers concept. That is, Net ODA is net only of principle payments received on ODA loans, not of interest received on such loans, while NAT is net of both. This is especially relevant for Japan, which has received more than $2 billion/year in interest on ODA loans recently. Second, NAT excludes cancellation of old non-ODA loans. For example, a 2003 Paris Club agreement cancelled some $5 billion in non-ODA official debt owed by the Democratic Republic of Congo. That cancellation is ODA, but since it generated little or no additional net transfers, it is not NAT. As a result, the DRC received $5.4 billion in ODA in 2003 but only $400 million in NAT.

NAT is built from the same underlying DAC data as ODA. The NAT data set includes totals by donor (for 1960–2006), by recipient (1965–2006), and by donor and recipient (1965–2006), all in both current and constant dollars. Figures by donor are also available in national currencies. The data tables by donor and recipient are too large to fit in a Microsoft Excel file, and so are provided as comma-delimited text files in a zip archive.

Download the data sets

NAT - Excel, Zip file (2MB)

NAT - text, Zip file (5MB) requires Winzip (free download)